Brown rolls snake eyes with Guys and Dolls
Erika Kwee
Issue date: 11/6/09 Section: Entertainment
| |
|
Guys and Dolls is a lively comedy set against the backdrop of prohibition-era New York. In a last-ditch attempt to obtain the money he needs to host a game of craps for the high rollers in town, craps master Nathan Detroit makes a bet with the smooth-talking Sky Masterson that he can't get Sargent Sarah Brown to fall for him. But of course, Masterson and Sarah end up falling in love. Disaster ensues and misunderstandings abound as the two try to sort each other out.
The story may be tired, yet the play's leads are anything but. Wiess College sophomore Liz Castillo plays Sarah Brown with pitch-perfect uptightness, bringing her clear, expressive and well-controlled voice to the role. Jones College sophomore Lilla Pivnick also excels in her hilarious and bubbly portrayal of Miss Adelaide, with a faultless New York drawl and an impressive command of both her singing and dancing roles.
Masterson, the slick high roller, is played by Hanszen College sophomore Spencer Boucher, a talented male lead, decently matched against Castillo. However, aside from their excellently paired singing talents, Boucher and Castillo display almost no believable chemistry onstage. Their relationship seems more that of a domineering master and a na've child, and it lacks the romance needed to support the play. The relationship between Miss Adelaide (Pivnick) and Nathan Detroit (Jones senior Stephen Nelson), is more believable, but only because Miss Adelaide is so over-the-top in her perky obsessiveness with her resistant fiance.
Castillo's projection is excellent, which comes in handy throughout the performance. The band, directed by Brown sophomore Joelle Zigman, occasionally drowns out some of the quieter singers. The strength of the band lies in the full, well-rehearsed main numbers. However, the band also tends to bog down the tempo of both the slower and the faster songs, and the violins and clarinets sound consistently out of tune.
Fortunately for the dancers in Guys and Dolls, the band keeps up during the majority of the dance numbers. Choreographed by newcomers Brown sophomore Jasmine Elliot and Wiess sophomore Jessica Manriquez, the dances are mostly comprised of simple choreography, with the exception of the impressively intricate and showy craps game sequence. Many of the numbers looked slightly sloppy - the several strong dancers in the production were unable to carry the amateurs onstage.
The stage set is also simple - the cardboard cutouts of New York City skyscrapers are a pleasure to behold upon the beginning of the show. The cutouts get monotonous by the end of the show, however, as they are altered very little throughout the entire production. Still, one very cool stage prop makes a brief appearance, when Sky and Nicely-Nicely Johnson make a daring escape through a manhole in the stage.
The show is mostly buoyed by the strength of the leading cast - this production is nearly worth attending simply to hear Castillo's angelically precise vibrato and Pivnick's perky accent. Duncan College freshman Estevan Delgado also makes an adept debut in the supporting role of Nicely-Nicely Johnson, bringing his energetic presence and expressive projection to a welcome dose of comic relief.
The leads are worth the money, but while Guys and Dolls is a valiant effort, the talent is young and unfocused. The sloppy dancing, overpowering music and somewhat disjointed scenes make for a rough ride that is difficult for the inherent vocal talent to redeem.



Comments from unregistered users are subject to editor approval. Log in or register now to post a comment immediately. Alternatively, you may now even post a comment anonymously.
Viewing Comments 1 - 10 of 19
Theater Guy
posted 11/05/09 @ 5:07 PM CST
I don't understand what this review is trying to say. If the production "rolls snake eyes," then you're saying it's a bomb. The reviewer waffles between giving individual performers a pat on the back and lamenting the miserable ensemble performance--and yet it got two and a half stars? I'm confused what these ratings mean. (Continued…)
Kensey King
posted 11/06/09 @ 2:49 AM CST
Hey, I would just like to point out some few problems 1: the set is not simply "cardboard cut outs", it's all normal wood and took weeks to make and build. (Continued…)
Kensey K.
Kensey King
posted 11/06/09 @ 2:55 AM CST
Hi, I read the review and had a few problems I would like to point out: 1: the stage was not merely "a simple cardboard cutout", it was actually all constructed with wood and took about 4 weekends of manual labor. (Continued…)
Salvador Gabriel de la Mar
posted 11/06/09 @ 11:31 AM CST
It's sorta tacky to respond to your own show's review, but Kensey's right about the omission of Nathan Detroit in the review. He's THE main character. (Continued…)
Ach du lieber!
posted 11/06/09 @ 11:59 PM CST
I just saw "Guys and Dolls," and it's pretty clear to me that Eric has not seen it. As for the original author of this review, suffice to say she's dead wrong. (Continued…)
Theater Lover
posted 11/07/09 @ 7:18 AM CST
I saw the show last night and have to wonder if the "reviewer" saw the same show I did (actually it read more like a critique than a review). I agree with Ach du Lieber!'s comments - the show was a lot of fun, some great talent was on the stage and in the orchestra pit, and for a college productoon in a cafetria, it was great. (Continued…)
Christina
posted 11/07/09 @ 3:15 PM CST
Guys and Dolls takes place in the late 1940s/early 1950s and NOT during the Prohibition era, as the reviewer states.
T-BONE FAUST
posted 11/08/09 @ 4:46 AM CST
I'M SEEIN' THIS SHOW ON SATURDAY I THINK
I CHALLENGE YOU TO A REVIEW-OFF
ARE YOU MAN ENOUGH TO HANDLE IT?
ERIKA... I'M COMING FOR YOU
Rice 2006 Grad
posted 11/12/09 @ 6:10 PM CST
As a recent grad of Rice, I have attended (and participated in) numerous Rice college shows. Therefore I was quite excited to return to campus for Guys and Dolls and it turned out to be one of the best college productions I have seen. (Continued…)
Conor
posted 11/16/09 @ 12:20 AM CST
There were a lot of first-time-director errors, the most frustrating of which was the prolonged scene transitioning (if you have a lengthy dance number, like the Cuba scene, bring the set onstage as part of the choreography--don't make us sit still and watch nothing happen for five minutes). (Continued…)
Post a Comment