Quantcast The Rice Thresher
College Media Network

the Rice Thresher

The Student Newspaper of Rice University since 1916

Free-software activist speaks on moral duty to share

Cindy Dinh

Issue date: 8/29/08 Section: News
  • Print
  • Email
Software freedom activist Richard Stallman advocates the development and progression of open-source software. Stallman is well-known for launching tne GNU project in 1983 and lectures regularly at MIT.
Media Credit: Ariel Shnitzer
Software freedom activist Richard Stallman advocates the development and progression of open-source software. Stallman is well-known for launching tne GNU project in 1983 and lectures regularly at MIT.

While most people take for granted FBI piracy warnings and encrypted DVDs barring users from making illegal copies and distributing them, computer expert Richard Stallman offered a starkly different perspective. As a guest of the computer science department, Stallman spoke Tuesday in Duncan Hall's McMurtry Auditorium about the validity of the free-software movement.

Stallman, who lectures at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, is widely known for developing a free operating system called the GNU Project, which is similar to Unix. He has been outspoken since the 1980s about free software and campaigns against federal restrictions on copyright laws.

Not to be confused with the monetary definition of free, the free-software movement allows users to have full access to view and modify software programs instead of using only the finalized version from a software developer.

"The free software movement respects your freedom and respects social solidarity in your community," Stallman said.

Stallman centered his talk on four fundamental freedoms: the freedom to run a program; to study the source code and change it instead of being restricted by what the developer decides; to make copies and distribute them as you wish; and to contribute to the community by distributing the user's modified software.

Stallman said any software programs that lack these freedoms are proprietary programs, which he vehemently opposes.

"The social system of the distribution of use is unethical," Stallman said. "That software shouldn't exist since it's not contributing to society."

He said he believes open source code allows users to identify the components in the software and modify it according to their needs. Closed source codes, such as those in licensed software, do not fully disclose their programming, which Stallman suspects contains malicious software.
Page 1 of 2 next >

Article Tools


Comments from unregistered users are subject to editor approval. Log in or register now to post a comment immediately.

Viewing Comments 1 - 5 of 8

Mike Row

posted 8/31/08 @ 5:59 AM CST

"However, Stallman's point of view proved problematic for Mike Foss, a computer and electrical engineering graduate student.

"I didn't fully understand the premise he was coming from," Foss said. (Continued…)

(1 reply)   Details   Reply to this comment

Mik ileen

posted 8/31/08 @ 8:25 AM CST

"They publish the work in a secret format so that the only way to view [the source code] is through the proprietary software," Stallman said. "Microsoft never announced spy features on their program, other people discovered them. (Continued…)

Matthew Davidson

posted 8/31/08 @ 5:23 PM CST

Two corrections; one major, one trivial.

Richard never applies the phrase "open source" to his beliefs or what he is promoting. The open source movement started with a group of people who effectively split from the free software movement about ten years ago, and have been working to undermine it ever since. (Continued…)

Bob

posted 9/01/08 @ 1:51 PM CST

"It's a lot like giving addictive drugs to students so they develop a dependency," Stallman said. "The first dose is gratis, then afterwards you have to pay. (Continued…)

(1 reply)   Details   Reply to this comment

Samantha

posted 9/01/08 @ 10:48 PM CST

Matthew above is incorrect. "Open Source" is a term originally created to make "Free Software" more amenable to a broader range of people including business types. (Continued…)

(1 reply)   Details   Reply to this comment

Post a Comment

  • NOTE: Email address will not be published

Type your comment below (html not allowed)

  I understand posting spam or other comments that are unrelated to this article will cause my comment to be flagged for deletion and possibly cause my IP address to be permanently banned from this server.

Comments will never be removed or edited because of the commenter's ideology or viewpoint. However, comments with excessive profanity, that steer too far off topic, that are libelous or that resort to personal attacks are subject to removal. Comments made on the Thresher Web site may be republished in the Thresher's print edition, and may be edited for brevity or clarity.

In This Issue

Advertisement

Poll

What are your thoughts on the changes to Rice's amorous relations policy?
Submit Vote

View Results

This Week's Front Page

Download Print Edition PDF

Advertisement